seo-content
Evaluate page content for usefulness, E-E-A-T, readability, thinness, and AI citation readiness, plus last-mile draft cleanup (AI-typical phrasing and invisible Unicode watermark characters). Use for content-only analysis, not full-page technical checks.
Install
With your agent
Install OMGSkills skill "agricidaniel/claude-seo:seo-content" into this agent's normal skills directory: call the OMGSkills MCP get_install_plan tool for your agent and run the script it returns (it installs only the pinned commit and verifies SKILL.md), and stop if MCP or the pin is unavailable. Do not overwrite or change existing skills without asking me.
Manual command
git clone https://github.com/AgriciDaniel/claude-seo /tmp/claude-seo && ln -s /tmp/claude-seo/skills/seo-content ~/.claude/skills/seo-content
From README
Content Quality & E-E-A-T Analysis Google's "Who / How / Why" Test (canonical heuristic) Before scoring E-E-A-T sub-factors, every page audit should pass Google's own three-question heuristic from the helpful-content guide: | Question | What to look for | |---|---| | Who created it? | Visible byline, author bio page, professional credentials. Required where readers expect it; non-negotiable for YMYL. | | How was it created? | Process disclosure where readers would reasonably ask, especially for AI-assisted content. Original research / first-hand evidence / lived experience. | | Why does it exist? | "To help people" rather than "to attract search clicks." Watch for niche entry without expertise, content churn for freshness signals, content written to a word-count target.

